Also I wonder how it's going to work into A3 Spoiler the end of this in the comics ends in caps death. That isn't going to happen but I bet he's in prison when it ends or something
Talking about the whole movie. James Gunn @JamesGunn I have not seen it yet but everyone I know who has says it's AMAZING. The Russo Bros cannot lose.
Spoiler doubtful. maybe crossbones or a hydra sleeper cell agent? I don't think they really kill cap until infinity war
Spoiler Just to be ironic, I'd re-freeze him and then bust him out for IW where he can be the returning babyface
Spoiler i think he sacrifices himself to save the universe and defeat Thanos when he has all the gems. My ideal IW ends part 1 when he gets all the gems and kills a bunch of the heroes (like in secret wars 1, then the guardians come back with Hulk and Adam Warlock, free Cap to rescue the heroes. Ending with all of them fighting and defeating Thanos, but Cap dies at the end.
Seeing Cap and Bucky trade the Shield back and forth while they beat up Iron Man...like some kind of Captain America bukkake...incredible.
I think this version of Civil War might be about as much about Tony Stark as it will be about Cap, if that makes any sense. Despite how bad IM2 and IM3 were, Marvel has done just an amazing job at showing the character progression of Stark throughout the MCU with each film. Stark is someone that clearly has demons and remorse about his past (making his billions and empire from the blood of American Soldiers from IM1) and has been hellbent on trying to make amends. But the deeper issue, and I think is what essentially sets up Tony's version/side of Civil War is that Tony clearly doesn't trust himself and his own ability to do what is needed and is afraid he'll fail spectacularly at the worst time costing the lives of all his friends (shown by the Scarlet Witch vision). So now he's pretty much looking to get out of the superhero game and giving up his power and freedom so to speak to people he considers better men (or trying to create AI) than him. Cap's character progression has been pretty much straight forward from the day he tried to enlist as a 90 lb shrimp to now, he's always sticking up for the little guy and wants to prevent any and all trampling of individual rights, even if he knows the more pragmatic approach might yield better results aka the Goku effect (give him a choice to kill 100 people to save a million or give him a 10% success rate at saving everyone, Cap will take the 10% every time) Cliffs: looking forward to the movie.
gee which female thor villain out of the ...one...could that be? not counting when loki was a female.
Sorry, I was being sarcastic about not knowing. I have no problem if they make Amora the main villain, seeing how AOS has already established her younger sister as a villain. Or they could use Surter has the main baddy.
Thanks to Empire Online, we have a detailed breakdown of the Captain America: Civil War trailer direct from directors Joe and Anthony Russo. Below are some of the highlights, though the full version can be found by heading over to the site. There are a lot of very interesting reveals here, and it sounds like the movie will play out much differently to the comic book and how most of us have so far expected. Unfortunately, there's no mention of Ant-Man and Spider-Man here, but we'll no doubt get to see more of them next year when the promotional campaign really kicks off... Spoiler Joe Russo: "That’s not early in the film. But we felt like it was the cleanest way to draw a line and highlight that this is Captain America 3, and not Avengers 2 and a half. His memories are foggy. But he has them. He’s also different now. There’s a part of his personality that was under mind control, and he murdered a lot of people. So he’s got a very complicated history. Who is that person? How does that character move forward? He’s not Bucky Barnes anymore. He’s not the Winter Soldier anymore. He’s something inbetween." Anthony Russo: "All we can say about that is certainly The Winter Soldier has a very complicated history as an assassin and a weapon of Hydra – and that history ends up pulling him into a new conflict." Joe Russo: "The job is to tie all these films together. To be able to pull from The Hulk, which may have been forgotten about a little bit, and make it relevant again within the cinematic universe, is important to us. We thought it would be interesting to take a character who had a fanatical anti-superhero point of view. Now he’s become much savvier and more political and has put himself in a position of power, not unlike a Colin Powell. He’s cornering the Avengers politically now, he’s out-manoeuvring them." Joe Russo: "We’re using the essence of what Civil War was about. The comic book isn’t applicable to the storytelling that we’ve structured up to this point, but the concept of registration, the notion that heroes need to be either monitored or controlled because their power can be scary, is applicable. The Accords are the world jointly trying to govern the Avengers moving forward. It has to do with the effects of Ultron and Sokovia [the small city that Ultron tried to drop on the Earth from a great height at the end of Age Of Ultron], and New York City [roundly trashed at the end of The Avengers], and Washington D.C. [nearly devastated by falling helicarriers at the end of Captain America: The Winter Soldier]. Examining the third acts of all the Marvel movies, we’re saying, if you could point to the collateral damage in all those incidents, could you use that against the Avengers to control them?" Anthony Russo: "The challenge was, we’re doing the story of Civil War. Which everybody knows is nominally about superhero registration. And in a lot of ways that can be a political issue, and we didn’t want the conflict of the movie to solely exist on that level. We wanted to figure out very personal reasons why everyone’s relationship to this idea of registration is going to become complicated. That’s what the relationship between Steve and Bucky allowed us to do, to get very personal in terms of why people would lean one way or the other. The arc we’re tracking for Captain America, the thing we thought would be most interesting with this character when we came on board to direct Winter Soldier was to take him from the most ra-ra company man that you could get, this character who was a somewhat willing propagandist, and by the end of the third film he’s an insurgent." Anthony Russo: "Tony’s defining characteristic is his egomania, in a lot of ways and we thought it would be interesting to bring him to a point in his life where he was willing to submit to an authority, where he felt it was the right thing to do." Joe Russo: "When people leave the theatre, they’re going to be arguing about who was right in the movie, whether it was Tony, or whether it was Cap. Tony has a very legitimate argument in the movie that’s a very adult point of view, about culpability, about the Avengers’ responsibility to the world, and the world’s right to have some sort of control over the Avengers. It’s a very complicated emotional arc for Tony Stark in this movie. Downey is utterly amazing in the part. I think he’s taking this character he’s been crafting for years and goes to some very risky places in the movie with the character." Joe Russo: "Tony is a person who understands the grey as well as anybody. Cap is extremely black and white and there is a certain level of moral fibre and fortitude that a guy like Tony would perceive as being irritatingly perfect, and irritatingly obstinate. The notion of wanting to punch Cap in his perfect teeth is a way to express his frustration with Cap’s inability to conform to politics, and to compromise." Joe Russo: "It’s a combination of a practical costume and VFX. It’s a vibranium weave, a mesh, almost like a chainmail. Luminescence is something we have to do in post. He’s there for a very different reason which brings him into conflict with Cap and his team. His motivations are not their motivations." Joe Russo: "He’s hanging onto that helicopter for an extremely passionate reason. In stories you’ll read where a mother will lift a car off a child. There’s something very important happening in that scene and for us it really represented his struggle as a character, one man pitted against a helicopter that’s trying to take off. Can he stop it? And what are the limits of his strength? For us, it’s one of the most powerful shots in the movie and it’s Chris Evans, who works very hard to physically exemplify this character. On set, we had him straining against a crane holding this helicopter, and you have this fantastic shot of his muscles bulging and you can feel the pain and the energy and the determination as he tries to stop this thing." Joe Russo: "Zemo in the Marvel Cinematic Universe is not Zemo from the comics, and what’s interesting and surprising is that we don’t always honour the mythology from the books. One, because it’s predictable and two, it’s not servicing the story in the way we want. So, if Zemo were in this movie, I think people should expect that it’s going to be something fresh and exciting." Joe Russo: "The theme of the movie is betrayal and it’s a very powerful theme. The movie’s extremely emotional. It hinges on that emotion, and on a very personal level we didn’t want the movie to become about politics and people arguing about platitudes. The third act is built around a very personal moment between these characters."
so CA doesn't want to sign the thing, and IM thinks they should be regulated? i thought it was the other way around in the comics
No, that's the same way. Iron Man wants to regulate everyone so he can become the director of SHIELD, get all of the multi-billion contracts jailing people who refused to sign, and be able to order everyone around.
FWIW, I don't think that's the way they'll go in the comics. Seems to be a lot of talk of Stark's newfound since of responsibility for everything that's happened(similar to his turn from weapon sales). Always thought it was rather easy to paint Tony as the "bad guy" in the comics story, whereas I think we'll be pretty torn here.
No way they're going to paint Stark simply as a heel Stark wants himself (and the other powered people) to be regulated because he doesn't trust himself with that much power and responsibility. Scarlett Witch's vision showed him his worst fears which was everyone being dead because Tony fucked up. This is going to be one of those scenarios where both sides aren't wrong and you'll leave the film debating for weeks/months on which side has more validity, aka exactly what MCU/Disney wants the fans doing.
Oh, I know that Disney wants the movie Ironman to be a likable, profitable character. I was just answering the "Which side was Tony on in the comics" question.
Ryan Coogler In Talks To Helm Marvel’s ‘Black Panther’ Creed director Ryan Coogler is in negotiations to direct Black Panther, theDisney/Marvel pic that is starring Chadwick Boseman as the superhero. The pic that is part of the Marvel Universe has a February 16, 2018 release date. We’re hearing the negotiations are significant for this. It comes after Marvel was talking with several possible directors, including Selma helmer Ava Duvernay. Those talks cooled back in July. Coogler, who burst on the scene with the Sundance Fruitvale Station, which starred his current Creed star Michael B. Jordan. Warner Bros opened Creed over Thankgiving weekend and it has grossed $29.6M to date. Boseman was cast as Black Panther in October 2014. The superhero will make his first Marvel Universe appearance in Captain America: Civil War, due out May 6, 2016. He appeared in the movie’s first trailer that just dropped on Jimmy Kimmel Live! The news was first reported by film blog Birth.Movies.Death.
I've been watching Jessica Jones. Pretty dark, not as good as DD for me, but I don't know the character. Killgrave is creepy as hell. I'm only like 6 episodes in, but I like how hard he's been to get rid of/capture. Would be an awesome power, although my go to has always been teleportation.
I really can't think of a better power. If you wandered to North Korea in less than a day you'd run a country with nuclear weapons.