I would tail it so that if you lose you can at least get some money out of it, but that would be running the risk of losing by less than 3 and doubling up on the pain.
hard to bet against urban in this spot. but jt barrett hasn't been very good. they've played great defense all year. obviously comes down to how watson plays. i bet the under at 61. not sure i'll play a side.
This Georgia QB is awful. And that kick was terrible. We are gonna need miracles to stay in this game.
That looked obvious though. Hill was stopped right next to the hash mark that he needed to get to. The physical evidence was all within the frame. Looked obvious to me, but maybe they saw something I didn't.
FSUsem when you posted 4**** on Georgia Tech over. I read it as Georgia 4**** lol. Thanks for the pick!
i was going back and forth on the stanford/UNC game after mcaffery went out. i just totaled it out. i have stanford. 3 units -2.5. 2 units -3. 1 unit -2. 3 units 3.5 on UNC. if it lands stanford -3 i win 7 units.
Yea QB for Stanford got hurt and his backup looks pretty mediocre. good news for you is UNC can't get out of their own way. And the umpire stripped UNC QB trying to get out of the way and gave Stanford the ball in the RZ with like 1 minute to go in 1H. never seen that happen before. Your middle actually looks very possible. Nothing but FGs happening
was there a write-up on South Alabama pick? I'm betting that one blind with the sheet. haven't seen a snap from either team this year. why do we like them?
I think we are looking at different sites when it comes to the percentages. I don't see any reverse line movement. I mention this earlier, but I'm not sure how correct my site or any site is on the percentages. I'm not sure how these sites get the numbers, and if it straight from the sports book, why they would give out these numbers. My side shows 51% on South Alabama so, assuming that's correct, obviously a big assumption, I wouldn't categorize it as reverse line movement.