the raiders are why Ruggs went ahead of JJ. Ruggs is clearly fourth imo but the other 3 it’s splitting hairs. They’re all very different based on what you need.
agree. Why’d we ever move from 3 in that scenario. We are staying put with a small chance of moving back does Cannata know anything? Seems no with that shitty disclaimer
in the best case scenario imo. worst case, the fins went full Draft day and give it all back plus some to get back to where they were.
I’d offer them the niners 3rd at max. If they’re good flipping back to take a qb at 6, I’d call their bluff that they’d take pitts over a QB at 4
same. As much as I enamored with Pitts, it would be such a bad look to overpay in a trade up only for the falcons to take a QB anyway.
If we traded 50 to move up to 4, we'd have basically traded a 2nd and got a 2023 1st and 2022 3rd to move back 1 spot I think. Not the worst haul. That's assuming they'd do it for #50 of course.
That doesn't make sense. "Look for us to take a QB" but "we're trading back to get the QB we want". QB is the one position in the draft you overpay, if you have to. This isn't RB.
There's minimal to no threat of losing your QB dropping from 4 to 6. If you can squeeze the Fins for a 2nd round pick or more, it's worth it.
The Bengals are 100% not taking a QB and 99.9% not trading out of that pick, so you're getting an extra day 2 pick to make the same choice of players nearly guaranteed. They'd be dumb not to if that's really the scenario.
We were solid last year with bums on offense, and it looks like they’re in the process of fixing that
Personally think it's too early to judge but if Pitts/Chase turn into impact guys in the next 12 months Grier is going to be out of a job