Besides the point but calling it a clip is "tell me you know nothing about firearms without saying you know nothing about firearms"
How many if those 6.6 are yours Now? Now maybe don't look down on someone that knows little about guns. It's a good thing.
No offense, but this is the same weird obfuscation gun dick heads use to argue that we can't regulate firearm ownership in the US because you don't enough about what is a "semiautomatic" or an "assault rife."
Feel like we can let WhiskeyDelta off with a warning for poor phrasing and move along here. He’s good people, and certainly didn’t mean it in the same way as the usual 2A hardos.
Probably jumping to conclusions here but I don’t think sleeping in a car with a gun is a reason to be shot
I cannot comprehend the thought process in this situation. Absolutely fucked. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.re...wsuit-for-officer-who-shot-a-dog-in-2019/amp/ Latest on that story https://www.cpr.org/2021/05/19/two-...r-old-woman-with-dementia-criminally-charged/ Shoot children with mental illness https://www.reporterherald.com/2021...awyer-release-further-information-on-incident
watched the video I suggest no one do that. It’s heartbreaking. They beg and beg to be allowed to take the pup to the vet to get him help and the pos wouldn’t let them.
1) wrong mask, asshole 2) what good is a kkk mask if you can’t see out of em and they also don’t hide your identity?
that guy was armed though, it sucks that there is no more accountability. People use a story and run with it. Most directed at you Emma but just the media in general nowadays.
Cops didn't know that when they were beating him. They stopped him for "drugs." Cops were relived of duty and all charges were dropped.
they definitely knew, it seems pretty clear by their actions. The guy was trying to get to the gun in his pants, that’s why he was resisting. i am all for bad cops to pay the price for their actions but that is not an example of that.
Weird, not a single one of them mentioned "gun" prior to the office throwing haymakers while the other 2 hold him back. Within seconds of putting g hands on him, they did ask him if he wanted tk get shot though. https://360.articulate.com/review/content/1cef843c-4a50-4566-a9a9-d068cff490b4/review
Well, if they did not do what they did one of them is probably dead now. So if they did that just to beat up a black man it kind of saved their lives. My guess is that they at least suspected him to have one and did not let him get his hands free.
Why do you assume he was going to shoot cops? Why would they suspect him to have one? It was inside his boxers, no way to see it at all. They didn't find it until they unbuttoned his pants and pulled open his boxers. You can see that in the video.
And if it's ok to beat anyone suspected of having a gun, why aren't 95% of white people in rural America beaten when stopped?
This is a lot of bad in a short post dude. So what you’re saying is that cops should assume black men have guns because of the off chance they get it right? Please tell me there’s an angle I’m not seeing.
My uncle hasn't been sober in 40 years and hasn't left home without a gun longer than that. Every cop in the county knows that. He's been pulled over countless times and weirdly he's never been beaten. Can't imagine why that is.
Again, I’m going to pray I am misreading this because otherwise Y I K E S Don’t get me wrong, if he’s advocating beating the the living shit out of every human being that open carries a gun in this country, sign the fuck up. That’s his only out.
That’s what I said? Because I definitely did not say that. i think that a drug dealer has a good chance of having a gun on him, I also think that they probably had an idea of who they were going after. Come on with that, don’t put words in my mouth please.
Now explain why you think they saved lives. Do most people with a gun that are stopped end up shooting police?
Im giving you an opportunity to explain because I guarantee you I’m not the only person that read it that way. I don’t care if they know he’s a drug dealer. If they beat him brocade they suspected he had a weapon and not knew with full certainty, it’s wrong. That’s not how law enforcement works because they aren’t motherfucking precogs. All you’re doing is giving logic to their reasons for beating black men
they would probably be a bit different with him if he resisted an arrest. But whatever, I am not going down this rabbit hole again with you guys. Continu to just assume that every time something like this happens to a black man it’s automatically racism. I don’t deny that it happens way too often but not everything is always racism. It could be racism that saved their lives who knows, i never said that it was ok…just said it because you assumed that it was race driven.
If he was reaching for it, I doubt that it was to show them how sweet his new gun looked like. but we don’t know if he was reaching for it, I assumed that they had that much urgency when they saw him try to move his hand in that direction. But I don’t know. if they beat him up thinking he was unarmed it is awful and I agree with you guys
I don't think anyone mentioned race as a factor until you did. The issue is 3 cops shouldn't have to beat a man to arrest him. They literally asked him within 3 seconds "Do you want to get shot?" That's not ok.
Cops get pissed and beat people when people don't fully cooperate. It's not urgency, it's a God complex and they are offended when someone doesn't follow their instructions. It's kind of their thing. I realize you don't live here and don't know how it is so you should probably sit this one out.