Is this dissimilar to what Gallant Knight wants to do with a legal funding company? A lot of this just seems like ways to bypass accredited investor rules. Which may/may not be a bad thing?
But couldn't she just do this on a normal website? What's so new and revolutionary about it? Couldn't I just get a QR code of my farts and sell it that way or with a piece of paper saying it's a fart? These are the arguments being made. I gave you all an entire day to think about it and was happy to see the fart news at least made it here.
Nobody ever said the jpeg art could be done on another website. That's a legit use and there's a market for it. Typically I'm "collect what you want", but if you're buying paintings, digital or irl, or fart jars, I'm going to assume you're a weirdo.
Same thing with snkrs and every other post you've made. If only the search worked properly I could help paint that picture for you.
Right, I get that, but you're missing the point. Buying and selling fantasy football rosters is not the same as buying and selling 1/1 jpegs. One is a legit use, one is a rebrand that can be done easily without an nft.
The missing point is none of you are understanding how the blockchain works. You, more specifically. And I'm not going to explain it to you. I'm just going to get in this reply war with you again telling you that you're incorrect. The same people bringing up QR codes, COAs, or their friends physical art. You aren't here to really understand it. You're here to argue. That's your game. Others are here to be cute and negative. As if taking the time out of their day to do that isn't weird, either. But these only cater to my argument and use cases about NFTs and specifically the blockchain for authentication and verification purposes. The part I bolded above is where you, and most everyone else, continue to fail.
No, I'm fully on board with nft's for authentication. That's a legit purpose that I hope comes to the sneakers world. You seem to think I'm anti-nft. I'm not. I think they have great purpose in some situations. I just think some of these things being brought up are just rebranding and using nft's to make it seem new but it's not. You want nft's to have a use for everything up to curing cancer.
You can't. That's new. The owning a jpeg thing is new. That's what I said. Did you even read my post? Buying and selling fantasy football rosters is not new.
Please stop telling me how I think. The only thing I think about you re: NFTs is you're not fully understanding the blockchain and coming up with the same repetitive arguments to say things already exist. And you're right, in most cases, they do. What happened to Vine and Blackberry? They didn't adapt and resisted change. Look at 24 pages of you all failing to understand change. I've already preached that change is hard. It's also inevitable and I think some of the things I've discussed 100% happen this year. Even if Snkrs and Draft Kings already have a marketplace. Last thing I think about you. You're like several others trying to argue with me about a topic I know the way more about than you do. I also think it's clear we aren't hitting the same topic points and focusing on checking off our own. One of us does that a lot.
I figured someone else posting the fart story would clear up the air about NFTs and help a few of you digest the change that is happening
Again, 1/1 digital art is not the same as a fantasy football rosters. It's pretty funny that you can't grasp that. The nft is what makes a jpeg into a 1/1. That's new and different. It doesn't change the fantasy football roster. The roster is still the same and it's still attached to the person's account that bought it. Only that person gets paid if it wins that week. DK could easily do it without an nft. Make a team on Monday using a backup RB, starting RB is ruled out on Friday, so now your team is worth more. It cost $100, put it on a DK marketplace and someone can buy it for $120. After they buy, it's now connected to their DK account. Shame on DK for not doing that and it's awesome that guy is making a new style of fantasy but it's not a product that's dependent on an nft. That is in no way similar to buying a 1/1 jpeg of a fart jar, no matter how much you want it to be.
We're not arguing about the same things. That's what is funny. The blockchain changes all of everything else that you just typed. The token, not the JPEG. The token allows all of the other things to come together in ohhaithur that make it different from Draft Kings and the example you provided. It takes up less bandwidth on the server. It's faster. It's more secure. I'm not going into greater details on these things because this convo is already over your head. The code behind the NFT/blockchain/JPEG is 100% what makes this work better than how your vision of mobile apps and the internet works today. It's not that hard to grasp with a quick google search and a little effort.
No, I'm not. That's the disconnect. You keep trying to tell me what I'm doing is also as incorrect as your opinion and knowledge of the blockchain.
The "you can do that on a random website" argument was about buying and selling fantasy football rosters. You referenced it today with the farts. So don't say you weren't connecting the two.
I WAS MOCKING YOUR PREVIOUS POST Both need the blockchain to do what you're saying/asking/arguing. Why are you having a hard time understanding the blockchain as the reason for the disconnect?
Next time I'll copy/paste it verbatim. Again, if the search feature worked I'd show you how you posted "but can't the internet do that already" as your argument or dismissal for just about everything the past 2 days.
Why are you so thick headed? Buying and selling fantasy football teams doesn't require a blockchain. I get that you want electricity to require nft's but some things have existed before nft's and a rebrand doesn't change that. Fart jar jpegs require an nft. Buying and selling fantasy teams does not.
No, not everything. Just the shit that's already existed prior to nft's. If a project uses nft's, you think it's a new novel thing the world has never seen. That's the funny part. Nft's present another option to set it up and that's great but it's not a new concept that couldn't and didn't exist before nft tech.
No, what he’s talking about is high interest loans to litigants with the future judgments as collateral.
So... What happens when StockX transitions its e-commerce marketplace to 100% this model? Some other things you boomers need to catch up on and stop having such a salty attitude Brb finding the post where I said 100% of you would be interacting with NFTs by the end of this year. It's only January..
I completely understand and find value in NFTs, I just think dropping $30k+ on pictures of monkeys (or digital art) is fucking stupid, but I guess I may be out of touch with that.
Spending $1000 on a shoe locked in a vault that cost $100 last year is fucking stupid, but there's a big market for it.
Also, the cat picture that keeps getting brought up currently has a floor price of ~12 ETH. I didn't really spend the 9 ETH out of my own pocket. I basically traded another NFT for it, that I paid .6 ETH for. I could accept a 6 ETH offer on it right now, and that's still turning .6 ETH to 6 ETH in about 8 months.
I'm aware of this. I just posted a tweet stating that the leader of the sneaker game is now selling NFTs... Other brands' shelves/vaults/storage/overhead/storefronts are transitioning to NFTs as their eCommerce platform as well. FYI, this is Adidas, Nike and now StockX in the space. StockX is the first to tie the digital to a physical piece (the vault). Adidas is releasing their first "phase 1" physical set, and the digital NFT tied to that is currently over 1 ETH. NIke's NFT is currently just a digital NFT from a brand that they just acquired, and last I checked the floor price on those digital only (for now) NFTs was 4ETH.