Uvalde, TX School Shooting

Yeah I'm not trying to bag on you, sorry. There's a big difference between not knowing something and then being all "oh ok i didn't know that gbr" and stubbornly quadrupling down. You're not the one doing the latter

 

You should probably explain to everyone here how my characterization of the article is inaccurate.

 

Thanks Dr. Spaceman

 

You still haven't googled "cardiac arrest" and "myocardial infarction" I see

 

I haven't. But, in my defense, I'm aware of the difference.

 

Go on. Tell the rest of the class.

 

Why would I cooperate with someone being so incredibly condescending?

 

Boy you're calling it down

 

I don't know what this means

 

You're the reason your neighborhood is dangerous

 

Obviously

 

Do not pet the animals or tap on the glass, please.

 

There is nothing less interesting than seeing one side of an argument. Please disengage.

 

Just come out and say you were too scared to go in, and that your fear cost the lives of children.

Being scared is a normal human response, covering your ass, while also a human response, is far less forgivable than the fear.

 

Ailoi, here's why I'm probably not alone in having some undismissable low grade suspicion you're kind of a covert republican. Your brain does republican things. Only apropos that your handle is an homage to your notion of covert mayonnaise.

In a remarkable feat of ignorant, loutish tone deafness, you blurt "she didn't have cardiac arrest" when, perhaps unbeknownst to yourself, you have no idea what you're talking about. Enter people who do. Nope, you're just gonna remain obtusely tethered to your ignorance rather than say "ah right on." You're either blissfully unaware of how ignorant you sound, or you don't care. Those are the two kinds of republican brain.

 

this is what I mixed up

 

I'm certain I don't care about your suspicions. I have an idea though. I will ask a simple "yes" or "no" question, and if you answer "no", I will concede my abject wrongness. Deal?

 

I'm certain I don't care about your concessions. You're wrong. You'll realize it or you won't.

 

Wrong about what?

 

At what point do I ignore user pnk$krtcrÿnästÿ solely for not being able to control himself?

 

Petition to change AIOLICOCK‘s name to Dr. AIOLICUCK

 

This is accurate.

 

Seconded

 

It's not his fault.

 

Nothin cooler than going all 2008 "u mad bro?" in a thread about 19 dead kids.

Sorry I had a fight in the middle of your black panther party. I'm mad, bro.

 

Who did that?

 

The only way you could remotely say “She didn't experience cardiac arrest” is if you think the mother is lying about what her Drs said. You certainly aren’t standing on any relevant knowledge of medical science, or details about the case, to come to that conclusion. Nothing in the two articles are evidence of her not having cardiac arrest. Pretty simple.

 

The point is that you don’t know what happened because you don’t have access to the patient’s chart. All you have is the secondhand reporting of a distraught parent.

 

The article, nor the parent, also don't mention anything at all about MI. Because of course they didn't. The parent's not confused. Aioli is.

 

Mother's statement indicated that she was at risk of going into cardiac arrest, not that she had actually lost consciousness, heart function, and ceased breathing. They would have been doing compressions and ventilations and probably used an AED in that case. It's a lot more serious than "near heart attack". Which is what I based my statement on. If the articles description of the incident as being "a near heart attack" is inaccurate then I retract my previous statement, but that's what it's based on. hth.

 

Meanwhile, back on earth, the article that doesn't mention a heart attack:

 

So you in fact don’t know if she went into cardiac arrest or not. Which was exactly my point. So yes, that did help. Thank you.

 

I based everything off of the information in the article

 

Not the article that was linked

 

The article that was linked is a summarization of the People article. I pointed this out two pages ago, and it says as much in the Yahoo article that was linked.

 

Glad we are arguing about the semantics of a child’s suffering

 

Well I'll give you a nod for your hard work, but none of it changes at all how face-palmingly dumb and wrong this is

 

Nah there's just one person here who apparently thinks their suffering's being a little overblown

 

I thought people might be alarmed that she had gon into cardiac arrest and received to discover that she hadn't, like I was.

 

Yeah but it's more likely she did than didn't though. Do you realize that yet? Or are we still working on the CA vs. MI thing?

 

i was talking about the aioli master

 

I know I'm going to sleep better tonight for having read through it.

 

Sometimes, I don't really understand this place. Like, I accept that everyone is extremely annoyed and angry at everything I post. Like obviously I'm fucking up everyone's experience, right? Well, I'm not gonna stop posting here, I enjoy it. So why don't you guys ban me? I've literally asked to be banned numerous times. I fucking never donate to the site. This should be a slam dunk. Yet...here I remain. Maybe this will be enough? idk...

 

Got to be one of the worst I've seen in quite some time.

 

I don't know. Mods. It's been a while since the last time.

 

Hey guys like I said I'm really sorry to shit up the thread but someone erroneously dismissing that kid's near fatal response to her friend's death is just too, too shitty for me to be cool and mature about. I'll try to do and be better

 

I don't enjoy the annoying people part.