Only in the sense that any case can lead to that outcome, because it’s not a legally possible outcome of this review. It would also require them to overturn Dobbs’s holding on substantive due process.
The conservatives justices all tout the Bible as often as they can but conveniently ignore the part of Genesis that takes like 5 fucking minutes to get to: Bunch of cherry-picking hypocrites.
Something, something, don’t fight a war with people who buy ink by the barrel where the modern corollary is don’t threaten lawyers with lawsuits
SC already has a bill in the State Senate that would ban abortions after fertilization, defined as when the sperm enters the egg.
nothing like the world getting more progressive and our country is shrinking into evangelical extremism because some people wearing robes said so
apple is doing this and has a giant campus in austin seems odd (it doesn't) they wouldn't target them
I think something that gets lost a lot is for a group that hates metropolitan voters so much Republicans sure do get mad when they can’t enjoy in all of the metropolitan offerings
The last several years have made me acutely aware of how many of "them" are always out and about. "Hey BB, isn't it pretty liberal where you are?" Sure, but what does that matter if shitbag Republicans are always zipping into town to hang out at the same bars and restaurants that I do?
I would love to know how Clarence Thomas views himself. It's so hard to envision him being this bad of person. There has to be an angle
TX, MS, AL, FL: "well then, we'll just ban women and girls of reproductive age from getting on ships and boats"
Listened to a bit on npr on Thomas and the crux of it was that he thinks that we basically need to revert back to a full on, pre civil rights movement racist country so that strong black men can gain prominence and a leadership role in their community again, basically liberals are purposely weakening black males via handouts
Oh it's the "Dems are keeping AAs on the plantation" argument that you see terrible message board posters make . What an idiot. Should have guessed!
I’m aware of what this means and the significance of it, but there are people here who may not know, perhaps you should elaborate on what you mean.
So Pete has to answer for his husband’s social media post, but when it comes to Clarence Thomas we’re supposed to separate his wife’s actions from his own?