Completely agree, but she still probably has more juice nationally than any other Black female politician imo. I'm probably wrong about that though.
Well, can’t really argue Democrats are pro labor anymore. Goodbye white working class voters. Kind of wild to see.
Someone learning that no president has been as pro labor as Biden in modern history but also that is an extremely low bar
but yes treating the president siding with the 45% of rail workers that voted to ratify the deal as a nuclear incident is very dumb theres enough perturbed house and senate members there might be a shot for the 55% yet (obviously with zero support from Republicans for the increased sick leave days)
Yeah, and I’ve seen what I’ve seen all along, the managerial class casually dismissive of anything that isn’t perfunctory virtue signaling purity politics or doesn’t directly affect/benefit them.
are we doing another of those "i got mad at something i saw on twitter and I'm going to scream at tmb users" about it thing?
i do implore everyone to call their house and senate representatives to advocate for voting for the amendment to add sick leave to the agreement though. it's getting a vote (because silly Nancy Pelosi wants one)
Yet it’d be justifiable, if I were riled up over housing/zoning laws, identity politics, student loan forgiveness, or a myriad of fuck all shit I could care less about?
my point is acting like this thread is your cut out for whatever comments you read that make you mad elsewhere is a waste of every ones time just yell at them directly where they are maybe use the first rule of the internet and don't read twitter comments?
I made an innocuous standalone comment. The “cut out” happened after your dismissive attitude and the reactionary take of a one note fraud.
No no no. To be reactionary is to presume you know why I did, and then to react with that presumption in mind. So it was reactionary.
I clarified earlier and you are aware, responded to it. So there’s nothing to discuss beyond you accusing me of not knowing what a reactionary take is… and I think I just laid out pretty simply why it was. If you’d like to argue it was an honest mistake, or my intentions were unclear - that’s fair, but it was a reactionary response nonetheless.
wonder how big of a dark turn all these white millennial single men that got got their ass whipped by Crypto/NFT scams are going to take the culture has already left them behind, now theyve been scammed and are going to lash out and blame others for their problems.
you said that Democrats didn’t care about labor anymore and as a result wouldn’t win “white working class voters anymore”. This implies that white working class = labor force.
thanks counselor and it's not reactionary to question why you're so focused on white working class voters so specifically, you could have answered why but you didn't because you spend all your time in twitter finance chud circles that baby bird you propaganda that for whatever reason you come here to scream about other posts at least bring the tweets they're mad at seeing and everyone can make fun of them for getting upset by anonymous twitter users
There were periods in between those sentences, sir. Again, if you’d like to argue I was unclear, and the resulting response an honest misinterpretation/mistake, fair. But nonetheless the response was reactionary and fueled more by what someone assumed than what was said.
dont want to assume if Chumbolone read that press release but liking it is interesting based on the tenor of his comments here
Just the vote for adding sick days. If they’re going to intervene it should be on the side of labor, though I’d rather they not interfere and allow those that want to strike to do so.