That Fox News poll pisses me off. Those are dangerous voter suppression tactics at play. And it’ll work because Alabama voters largely hate the idea of anyone keeping their entitlement programs and apparently hate women and POC being able to vote. Women will vote for Roy Moore en masse despite this and poor, rural voters will cry foul when the entitlement programs they enjoy are stripped away.
The only thing I can think of is his gig with SiriusXM being in jeopardy because all of the backlash to him rejoining the company.
I’m not sure enough of them do. That Fox News poll is horseshit. Jones is not up 10 points. That’s going to enrage this fringe voters and make Moore’s victory even bigger. I’ve heard enough stupid Alabama women voters voice their support for him. I saw enough women show up to Trump’s rally in Pensacola.
he is getting crushed in the college-educated women category, but has a huge lead in the non-college-educated women category
I’m not saying it’s enough to change the results, but Moore has done terribly with women historically.
This is a fucking joke, right? Who thought having a 12 year old interview Moore supporters, much less Roy Moore himself, was a good idea? Are we really not above talking to a 12 year old girl about aborting fetuses?
It does say on orders of the FSB. That’s probably not something Russia would want to admit, but I don’t read Russian.
I've got Sen. Blumenthal on my flight to DCA today. I feel like I should say something to him, but I don't know what.
I quit caring about this election weeks ago since it's not a matter of if, but by how much Moore wins by. Alabama Republicans won't pass this chance to be THAT much of an Alabama Republican. Edit: wanted to clarify
From what has been reported on for the past year, how can you still be confused about the Russians helping Trump win? Even if you are an extreme skeptic on what is publicly available, dont you think a ranking member on the House Intelligence committee would be privy to more evidence at this point than the general public?
Ha ha ha I watch Fox News. Nobody knows more about intelligence than I do. They tell me ALL of the facts.
the guy is making public claims that are simply not backed by any evidence. if what he said was true, impeachment proceedings would have already begun. i think it's reckless to start making those kind of claims without stating the facts that make the basis for those claims. of course, none of us dispute that russia intervened in the election on trump's behalf. but that is not the question, at least, to people with reasonable intelligence. the question has always been to what extent the trump campaign a) participated in the russian interference, and b) what did the trump campaign promise in return? for schiff to say that the russians offered to help and the trump campaign accepted that help...without providing any basis for those statements is just nonsensical.
Best of Right Wing Watch - 12/08/17 Here are the top five posts from People For the American Way's RightWingWatch.org of the past week. Click on the images or headlines for the articles. Roy Moore Calls His Critics ‘Unforgivable’ and ‘Pure Evil’ More... Far-Right Audiences Drag Two Of Their Favorite Female Pundits For Not Having Children Alex Jones Impersonates A ‘Liberal Lesbian’ Brain-Eating Dominatrix Liz Crokin: Trump Is ‘God’s Anointed’ And ‘Never Wrong’ Steve King: Black & Latino Members Of Congress Fostering An ‘Anti-White’ Culture
That Moore interview by the 12 year old video is sad enough because of how brainwashed the girl is. I'm sure my daughter will be a libtard because of how my wife and I will of course raise her, but it feels like it crosses a line when they're that young.
is this your first experience with a good foaming? it is schiff and everyone else who is wrong. not dome. he has all the answers
from the interview: "You have only weeks later the Russians making another approach to the campaign, this time at the highest levels, offering dirt on Hillary Clinton." He also mentioned other communications, including Donald Trump Jr.'s communications with WikiLeaks." we've known about the quid. where is the quo? where is the trump accepting of this help in exchange for something? there is evidence that obviously points to the quo as lifting russian sanctions. but until they are linked, there is nothing.
I don't know why I'm doing this. Apart from the timeline of communication and release of emails by Russians, what has the Trump campaign done to refuse the well-documented Russian assistance? Has Trump acknowledged a foreign adversary conducting a cyber warfare campaign against the US elections via social media, hacking his opponent's servers, directly attempting to hack voting machines, etc.? No. Has Trump taken any steps to punish or chastise Russians for doing this? No. Has Trump acted to enforce Russian sanction legislation passed by congress by a veto proof margin that he reluctantly signed? No. To me, that indicates acceptance of what the Russians provided. To me. Put that together with what we learned from Flynn guilty plea as to his conversations with Russia asking them not to retaliate against Obama sanctions because Trump admin would "rip them up." Only thing that provides any hope for future is that so much has come to light. If this were still a secret, I have no doubt the Magnitsky Act would have already been overturned. The investigation and a reluctant congress are the only things keeping Trump from selling our country to Putin.
i must have missed the part where he followed that statement with..."because of their help with the election." you realize they can always just point to a "russia reset" for their reasoning, right? i want the quid/quo to be true more than anyone.
Do you think that's how any of this works? You seem to believe there's going to be a video of Flynn holding 2 forms of government ID saying "I am going to get sanctions lifted in return for damaging info on Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump knows about it 100%."
This is fucking gross. “See I can control my self around a 12 year old child” I mean what in the fuck.