That is among the craziest shit he's said in his entire presidency and it will be forgotten by the end of the day.
She wrote an op-Ed in today’s WSJ about how none of it was her fault and Ava DuVernay is defaming her with her series. #shemad
I hope our lib social media platforms take individuals data so our death panels can sacrifice the lives of climate deniers first. I’ll help pack their shit to send them to an island.
Lol remember when posters in this thread were arguing that Amash wasn’t an absolute piece of shit? Edit: was that just a week ago?
“Further centralizing the house authority and undermining the institution “ These twats have been bitching for years too much power has been ceded to the executive and more needs to be in the hands of the people ie Congress
And if what he’s saying is true this is of a similar vein. He’s saying that the authority to proceed with lawsuits will no longer be by a full house vote but rather just the house leadership.
Just heard Maher basically say the Congress is turning into an impotent parliament that exists in other counties. Maybe it’s time to consolidate power if the rest of the govt dgaf There’s amash...being all principled what not.
which doesn't matter bc these votes are always down party line anyways so even if it did get a vote it would still go the way of the majority party
Idk. I could see Nancy, Steny Hoyer, and two Reps voting for something the left wing of the party disagrees with.
Why even have a full House then? If what he's saying is true and isnt just a smokescreen for some other shenanigans then I dont really have a problem with it
ENFORCE YOUR SUBPOENAS. Yet again, giving an example of a local record weather phenomenon isn't climate change. That's the equivalent of someone using a screenshot of a week of moderate temperatures without any major storms and using it as evidence against climate change. Click bait-y gotcha unscientific shit is bad on both sides.
which, again, wouldn't matter bc there are almost no against-party votes anymore so if republicans got the power then it would happen regardless
1. this is a committee power. Nadler is not the speaker, this authorizes nadler in his committee to enforce these 2. Regardless of bringing something up to vote, it would still always be per that party's priorities
Ok, but you’re not refuting Amashs point, and there are a lot of shitty individuals, most notably on the right at this point in history, so we should probably consider changes to the power structure.
Right now, nadler can't enforce it, it goes to a vote. Because the dems have control the votes passes. The same would occur if it were the republicans. I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm just saying what he's standing for makes no difference.
Getting DA and prosecutor spots around the country is a big thing for left-leaning people that is never talked about
the fact that this video keeps fooling middle-aged/old people highlights our issue and susceptibility to fake news/trolls/Facebook and Twitter bullshit
Look at the aggregate of extremes heat events over the last year, it’s a signal of the climate crisis and individual events are part of the crisis. Not a fan of Eric tho, he’s insufferable.
Don’t stick your fingers in people’s faces, especially a woman when you’re trying to earn their vote.
Watched the Barstool-Durant video for the first time. You really have to be a gullible dumbass who will believe anything if you think that video is genuine.
I’m surprised he didn’t press his finger against her pursed lips, smell the essence of her hair, embrace her hips and whisper to her that everything will be okay
His second tweet suggests that the leadership decision may then be equivalent to a full House vote. Sort sounds like the full vote is a norm and not a rule.
God damn. The democrats are going to blow the easiest layup off all time and get this prick re elected, aren’t they?