You should go to a doctor and have him look at your taste receptacles because Samoas are full of awesome.
Just happened to catch this a couple pages back and it didn't get enough love. Alternatively, I think having a child should be more difficult than, I don't know, getting your driver's license or obtaining the appropriate permits to put an addition on your house. There should be fees, tests, background checks, waiting periods, the whole fucking works.
Make the parents throw their illegal babies over the Hoover Dam and broadcast it in the corner of every channel all the time.
Obviously you couldn't without some kind of death-grip fascist system, but the world would be a much, much better place after a few years.
Well, you couldn't per se, but what you could do enforce existing laws and enact some new ones, for instance; A father not supporting his child is a form of child neglect, punishable with jail time. Now, if the guy is convicted, give him a choice of whether he wants to go to jail, or he can get snipped and walk. Same for women. Something needs to be done, idiocracy is happening right in front of our faces...
lol, the forced/coerced sterilization is one of the dumbest arguments people who think they are smart try to make.
China throws all their female babies in dumpsters and the strong ones jump back out and win gold medals for the gymnastics team a few years later. We could learn something from them.
Kurt Cobain killed rock. His life lasted twice as long as it should have. He is trash. His music is trash. Grunge is trash.
America would be better off if the president was an academic/intellectual appointed by his peers, and not some politician elected by the public.
I get what you're saying and don't necessarily disagree but Congress is the real whore in our nation's political machinery. This is true whether there's a republican or democrat in the Oval Office. Any real change in the American political apparatus will need to focus on minimizing the overwhelming impact of K Street/Capitol Hill lobbyists.
get rid of lobbyists term limits on senate/house that'll fix problems the presidential election does very little, by the time they're a candidate they've already been an academic/intellectual vetted by their party. its why ted cruz won't win
There are a few bad cops out there. That being said, I wryly smile each time I see a video of a cop that tunes up a jacknut that doesn't follow directions, whether they deserve it or not.
probably my biggest one: i don't think southpark is remotely funny i can't remember ever even chuckling at an episode
I'm lactose intolerant but I'm willing to shit for an entire night when I see these being sold. I can eat a box by myself without even thinking about it.
dammit Tobias, this has to be some weird crusade, or you've only seen the fart joke episodes, cause, I mean, fuck, man
i just don't understand the love of it. i have tried numerous times and it's just unwatchable to me i am so gay and awkward
I'm not going to defend it, but I still think that way. However, I wouldn't even make that post today because the morality and usefulness of the estate tax are both obvious.
Huh? I think Ted Cruz is a clown but when a guy like Alan Dershowitz sings your praises as a student, you're probably fairly astute.
the idea of a welfare queen is a myth perpetuated by a bigoted bogeyman to make people believe that low income minorities use welfare to buy beats and jordans. never mind the fact that most welfare recipients don't live in areas where there is a quality supermarket and end up shopping for food at convenience stores or at grocers that can gouge because they're the only option in proximity the law is perpetuating that stereotype while doing very little else to accomplish any means sorry, that got lost in translation yes, cruz is a very smart person, but i'm talking more about the inner party vetting process that usually winnows out the "extremist" candidates and gives us the candidates that are palatable
I never said anything about a "welfare queen", nor do I buy into that. I simply said that the law as stated, makes sense to me. If you're accepting public assistance, which is money to support yourself that is coming from other people, then there should be things you aren't allowed to buy with that. Tattoos, visits to psychics, etc belong on that list. Besides, the law still allows them to withdraw $25 a day that they could ultimately spend on those things if they so chose. I'm sure there are probably a couple things on the list that don't belong, but the majority of the items seem like total common sense. It's a completely rational thing to do that won't even be that big of a change to the majority of people on public assistance, and it's just gotten blown out of the water by the left as a way to make it seem like all Republicans hate poor people, the same way that Republicans take any reasonable suggestion by Obama and basically equate it to the holocaust. If a guy is standing on the street corner asking for money with a sign that says "need a new tattoo", are you going to give him the money or the guy on the other side that's asking for food?
Oh, I agree completely. The public's opinion of the executive branch is hilarious to me. It goes from "everything is about to change" to "this guy hasn't done a damn thing" over the course of a few years.
30 rock is better than Arrested Development and Parks and Rec . Justified is as good as Breaking Bad.
i just immediately block any dildo that posts about it on twitter/facebook. good way to cull the herd
I'm a drug free kid. Not why I hate the 4/20 shit though. The, "Lets get fuuuuuuuuuucked up" crowd is just as annoying.