I voted no. I think it will limit player movement and parity. People will have "their guys" and they'll be stuck for years. Just my opinion
Understood, but my logic is as anecdotal as yours. I know I'd trade less if these Ridleys, Kyler Mirrays, etc...could be kept no problem I know my dynasty leagues in pro turned into shit shows where teams don't have a chance for years I like the draft being important. I like teams being able to sell their seniors to rebuild and others going balls out to get them I think we have a great system now and I don't see the ability to stash guys forever to be a positive worth losing that for
if you're torn on it after knowing what your team could have been this year if it was a dynasty league, then you're never going to be sold on the idea.
This year I would, but the again I have a good amount of older players that probably won't keep making numbers