Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Mainboard' started by NilesIrish, Mar 4, 2019.
just to be clear, my 1st statement was sarcasm
It’s just a campaigning strategy, they’ve been hammering Loeffler on the stock sell off after the COVID briefing. She’s the richest person in congress, so the numbers are insane for what she sold off. Even though he isn’t running against her, going after her seems to be a successful strategy with how that race went.
I mean it really should be a rule, they are privy to way more economic information than your run of the mill person
Perdue did it too.
His stuff honestly sounds worse. But being able to say “$18 million” just catches a lot more people’s eye.
Is it as bad or worse than what Martha Stewart went to jail for? Probably worse.
Thank you president T!
Worse. They used information on committees they served on to gain information.
Hmmmm seems like someone else wrote that
why aren’t they getting charged? It’s only illegal if democrats do it
Lol, the quotes mean either he is quoting himself or wanted to take credit for a retweet.
Weird either way
I think it was looked into but the AG decided not to move forward.
Edit: Found this
He usually does that when someone on Fox says something he likes.
known left wing media, Axios
Her investments are a “blind trust” but her husband is the fucking chair of the NYSE I don’t buy that he doesn’t know exactly who is handling their money.
Loeffler was gifted her seat for more streamlined access to her husband.
the letter he wrote, on tax legislation he had no involvement with, to push for Sports Owners to get further massive tax breaks will have a much better chance to stick because the self-dealing stock trades have the facade of "Well my financial planner..."
I’m a complete political novice especially in comparison to you, but...
Isn’t that a more complex/difficult topic to explain to voters in this climate? With post-truth politics being as effective as it is, wouldn’t the brute force accusation that includes the absurd numbers ($18 mill, etc) associated with an easily understood mechanism (‘insider’ trading) be more sticky?
So, we're all in agreement that this would mean actual civil war correct?
I don't know about Civil War as much as just mass rioting across the country.
He's gotta be big in the chud circle
Weird how Rs only worry about fraud and election security after all votes are cast.
And only in very specific counties
There literally isn't a precedent to get to SCOTUS.
What's the jumping off point? I don't want to sleep through it.
There isn’t. If you’re serious I can’t say it enough, won’t be a civil war.
I’m declaring civil war on Daniel Ocean
Don’t worry, your sausage monarchy is not in peril
bring it you South Bay baby back bitch. West Side till I Die
IMO it has as much complexity as the great 2016 email server hygiene debate of 2016. Or the steps you have to reach to say Ossoff is paid by the Chinese Government. IMO you try. Cobb Voters are keen on handouts to sports teams. North fulton voters are too.
Just frame it as, Perdue wanted [x] # handouts and tax breaks to his billionaire friends. Then fine print the advert at the bottom with propublica dated 11/19/20. Etc etc.
It's over. Nothing is going to happen to overturn the results.
The only violence I'd be concerned with is from the trump crazies and their AR-15s
Trumpers: We’re going to destroy the GOP
Finally someone addresses the only thing I care about.
I honestly don't know how journalists throttle their outrage like this.
is this a trump judge?
Hard to beleive Rudy "The Closer" Giuliani couldn't work his magic on this one.
Shaping up to be a rough night for michigan posters
“He is large and I like him”
I like the way Yates talks so I’d pick her
he went to Mass