I didn’t say they were but there is arguments for us, Kentucky, Kansas, Indiana to say they definitely are the two biggest is nuts to me. UCLA signing with Jordan and moving to the B1G along with our history. Kentucky is huge so are Kansas and Indiana.
indiana hasn’t made a final four in over 20 years not gonna argue with you on the other two because there is certainly a debate even if i personally disagree. indiana certainly isn’t a remote debate and i would guess even their fans agree
I felt weird not throwing them in. My statement was more of it can be debated that other schools belong in the conversation more than arguing against either of those two teams. If that makes sense.
Why is Filipkowski not getting hype? I’ve watched 1 Duke game so know dick but would assume any top 5 overall recruit putting up those numbers would be a near lottery lock That FG % is rough
T-Rex arms and his athleticism won’t translate well. He’d be a great college player if he stuck around but I doubt he’s interested in that. I think he’s capable of shooting at a higher rate but he and Roach are the only two players who can do fuck all on offense so he has to shoulder a huge role, including creating his own shot.
Just turned it on to see what he finishes with. Toledo is putting like 3 guys near him to stop him from getting the ball.
Bates with a wild step back 3 to put them back up 1. They’re totally losing this game though. He’s gonna have 40 tho.
Was this ever in doubt? The majority of the 1st round is buying lotto tickets on players with potential
Yes. He was pretty bad last year, and Memphis had a preseason combine and his testing numbers were really poor
Lamelo Ball shot .375 from FG and .25 from 3 in his Aussie season I just don't think poor production holds a candle to athletic potential when it comes to drafting
Normally agree, but he's not athletic. Granted it was last year, but 24 in vertical, and negative wingspan is not great