I've had law professors whom I would also say don't understand how judicial decision making works fwiw
While that may be true, you're also a complete idiot incapable of admitting that you were wrong. UNLESS of course this is actually what you wanted in which case stop being a fucking coward and own that you enjoy people like Trump and his ilk running things
I don't agree at all with this. Rheinquist was partisan, but not an originalist. Seems most are going after originalism/textualism in this thread. Gorsuch is far more in that mold than Rheinquist ever was.
And Thomas is a shit writer and jurist. He uses originalism as cover for being actually bad at his job
I'm a strict originalist except for ignoring the fact that I don't have the power to do what I'm doing according to that very document. Doesn't make sense
Because it's a post hoc rationalization for partisan ends I'm actually a little surprised at how ideology poisoned you are even with my post the other day
You're completely unhinged. Perhaps you should take your medicine and take a break from the Internet for a bit.
I've said far worse to assholes like you. That was me being polite. Why are you struggling to own up to your very very obvious far right beliefs here?
The problem with originalism is it's a total sham and I find it hilarious that people believe it. Not even originalists want originalism, truly. They just pick and choose to use it when it suits them. Almost like they're actually just applying their ideology and experiences to their interpretation of the document. Hm what does that sound like
Then you must live a sad, very angry life. Perhaps you should look into starting a family or a career and finding some friends outside the Internet.
I'd rather have no friends than to be a far right loon who enjoys the assholes that speak at CPAC my guy.
Notice he turned to coming after me personally because he's too much of a bitch to admit what's very obvious to all of us here. This is my main problem with these people. All this fucking tap dancing when all he has to do is own up to the bullshit
I don't like anything about CPAC. I have distanced myself from the Republican party and "conservatives" my entire adult life. Yes, I sometime vote Republican in a "lesser of two evils" justification, but I fully recognize the lesser of two evils is still evil.
"Yes, I sometimes vote for fascists/white nationalists but that doesn't mean I'm a facist/white nationalist"
I'd like to see a single example from the past decade of a Republican being the lesser evil in a race
How am i going to address the room of people who hate me and have no interest in discussing ideas differing from their own. Every time I try and give a thoughtful response discussing my views, I get strawmen and ad hominem attacks in response.
There are multiple people willing to engage you in good faith you just choose to pick at the people mocking you. That's your choice so let's not pretend it's incidental.
Fwiw I don't hate you I just think you're a well-intentioned dummy who prefers to believe in the bed time stories he was told because they make him feel good. Which I guess is maybe an ad hominem
That's true, and I shouldn't have said that. That's the first time I've ever attacked CaneKnight personally on here. And probably the first time I've attacked anyone on this Board in that last decade plus. But if you look at CaneKnight's history of posts against me -- all insults and many wishing me harm -- I think you would understand my sentiments.
To clarify you're not a dummy, really. I am sure you're quite smart. You just buy into some dumb shit
FWIW I don't actually want anything bad to happen to you (FOR NOW) I just think you're a very simple human