Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Mainboard' started by wes tegg, May 21, 2018.
sometimes we don’t need context
with or without context it was what it was
I don't know about that. I've always thought my intentions were pretty clear every time I've done that
I can't think of any context that would be appropriate for
i was coming in with this one, hard to defend but there was a context
back to back posts in the same thread
No context needed, he means exactly what you think he means
I just enjoyed the quote. I got a “look them in the eye and finish like a boss” vibe from it
People from the south are sick puppies
We know all about your "hockey culture", don't try to get judgmental on us
In my defense, I was talking about the dreamy Anderson Cooper.
This whole thread would fit in here well.
to be honest none of those posts need more context. They are what they are
A guy just said that it would be a sweet moment to have sex with a horse and you don’t think that there is a context to his post?
Sterling was right, there is some sick stuff going on here
no. He thinks it would be okay to bang a horse. What context do I need?
As in like fuck a female horse? Or get fucked by a male horse? I need more context
exactly, also would be nice to know what type of setup he would prefer for the moment to be perfect
Everybody knows a female horse is a cow silly
Anyone who agrees to get fucked by a horse clearly has never seen a horse penis
This may be the most Shawn post in the history of Shawn posts.
Well, that was a better result than expected. We learned that Nandor the Relentless would be fine with having sex with a horse but the one thing that is stopping him is the size of it’s dick.
size doesn’t matter is just a myth
I believe you’re quoting Plato here, no?
To be honest that post doesn’t need more context. It is what it is.