The guy who bragged about walking in on naked underaged girls and about being able to do what ever he wants to women, is surely above it all
Yeah, Nebraska credit union and Boys Town. Dutroux affair https://www.nytimes.com/1996/09/12/...candal-just-one-of-many-belgiums.html?mcubz=1 https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2002/jan/25/worlddispatch.dutroux https://myemail.constantcontact.com...ffair.html?soid=1108369064136&aid=_KXajauYv_g
Detlef - but whatabout Clinton?! watson - stop making it about Trump, let me make it about Trump shook - Detlef + watson riner - Detlef + yikes Detlef Schrempf interesting company you keep
If Nancy doesn’t do something definitive she might as well be put in the press with the rest of these fucks. FTR, I don’t know what she can do.
He also took the payoff to let the Trump kids off a few years ago. Not sure how what he does is legal.
I shit you not, I very specifically said this exact statement to my wife last night and I just started reading this thread this morning.
I do these morality hypotheticals with my friends sometimes so here’s one: If you were the SDNY, would you be willing to agree to give Epstein total immunity and witness protection in exchange for those tapes and his total cooperation.
This could not happen to a more callous, arrogant, condescending piece of shit. Leave out the child rape and JE is still a reprehensible piece of shit. Rot motherfucker.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ i read yesterday that it wasn't applicable. gonna try to find the source of that to see what I missed
Acosta’s problem was that the Crime Victims Protection Act required the prosecutors to keep the victims in the loop on the deal, not that it prohibits the deal altogether.
***Disclaimer - I love to read the r/Conspiracy page for entertainment. I'm not a connect the dots guy, but am fascinated by the reality that people are willing to go to extreme lengths to connect arbitrary facts / events together in order to support a fictional narrative in the hopes that its actually true*** Prevailing conspiracy theories I've seen tend to center around him being backed by either the CIA or KGB to entrap rich / famous / powerful people and force them to do the bidding of one of those agencies. Like in the KGB's instance, Epstein is a useful tool to bring down the United States from within - blackmail celebrities to run PsyOps to destroy America culturally, blackmail policy leaders to make questionable foreign policy decisions that entangle the United States into unwinnable situations (i.e. long, expensive wars). In the CIA's instance, Epstein is a useful tool to further the CIA's control over day-to-day life within the US - blackmail celebrities to create entertainment that glorifies / trumps up war in order to desensitize the masses to war's actual reality, blackmail policy leaders to make questionable foreign policy decisions that entangle the United States in perpetual war and create the justification for 24/7 surveillance of the broader populous which furthers its control over said masses. You know...just basic stuff like that...The thought that either of these large scale, and audacious, initiatives would hinge on 1 person is typically glossed over.
I'm really hoping that quote is just taken out of context and that she really just hasn't completely abdicated her responsibility to conduct oversight of the administration