I feel like if I were gonna plot to overturn a United States election I'd probably do it on a burner phone, but no telling with these dipshits.
Mr fox did you think maybe you should provide a little more background/context or were you really just looking forward to providing a dumping ground for your dumbfuck followers to post their hillary gifs? (Rhetorical obv)
Dems are too stupid to do it, but if they had a brain they would employ some incredibly shitty internet ghouls and turn this guy into the Trump version of Seth Rich.
Absolutely. I really need to stop scrolling down and then entering a rabbit hole of 5 different connected Q accounts and the multiple Google searches to figure wtf they are talking about.
See the news headline, read the thread and move on without going further. Otherwise its just a cesspool of awful reply guys and morons
With as big as they are making it, this better be good. I normally go into my office on Tuesday but I'll work from home so I can watch it.
I can assure you they could have a snuff film starring, produced and directed by trump and absolutely nothing would happen.
idk the below is pretty bad by objective standards, but none of this seems new? Hutchinson has testified that the White House Counsel’s office informed Meadows and Rudy Giuliani that it would not be legal for states that Donald Trump lost to send slates of “alternate electors” instead of the electors who had, you know, been elected by voters. She also said Meadows had been informed in advance about the “the potential for violence” on January 6. Politico reported last month that Hutchinson told the committee she had witnessed Meadows “incinerate documents after a meeting in his office with Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.).” Perry, she said in testimony that the committee made public, had wanted to encourage Trump fans to go to the Capitol, while others on a planning call were “more inclined to go with White House guidance.” Perry was someone Meadows stayed in touch on January 6, as was US Representative Jim Jordan. What she said may be foundational to the committee’s case As Aaron Blake explained in the Washington Post in April: To meet the legal standard for obstructing an official proceeding — the crime the Jan. 6 committee has zeroed in on — you need to prove that the actions obstructed the proceeding and that they were undertaken with corrupt intent (i.e., knowing that what they were doing was wrong). Hutchinson’s testimony would appear to provide proof of both. She also reportedly testified that Trump was on board with hanging Mike Pence Meadows “told colleagues that President Donald J. Trump was complaining that the vice president was being whisked to safety” on January 6, the New York Timesreported last month: Mr. Meadows, according to an account provided to the House committee investigating Jan. 6, then told the colleagues that Mr. Trump had said something to the effect of, maybe Mr. Pence should be hanged. Hutchinson confirmed that account to the committee, the Times reported.
Hopefully it’s that the committee now has some physical evidence that corroborated some damning testimony of hers and we’re not having a rush hearing just for her testimony.
So the surprise witness is Cassidy Hutchinson, a former Trump aide? Going to be real fun when she stands up and yells, "WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL!!!!!"
I have a feeling this isn't going to go well. A person that committed to the asshole ideology is probably going in there as a plant by team Trump. But then again, I'm pretty black pilled now.
She's the lady that testified to all of the congresspeople asking for pardons. Maybe she found a receipt or two
Almost all testimony (everyone except the poll workers IIRC) so far has been by persons committed to the asshole ideology. She’s already given them testimony so the limit to how “bad” it can be is what she’s known to have testified to. I just don’t know what, if anything, she will have to add to it.