the data isn't wrong, but that doesn't mean the result will be OSU by 10. there's about a 21% chance ND wins. That's nearly five times the likelihood that Michigan had to beat OSU and we saw what happened Texas was a yard away from a tied fourth quarter score and Texas isn't significantly better than ND is we all know OSU is a great team but at the end of the day it's college kids chasing an oblong ball with blind people officiating it. lots could happen
yeah I was being an idiot a Little but I have been meaning to ask. How on earth can a 78% probability winning rate swing by 20 % on just a few plays. It seems to me like if that is the case the 78% was flawed to begin with? Not sure I am explaining well. I guess it’s a 78% winning IF you stay the course.
I have my own models but sharp sports betting odds have significantly higher long-term predictive success than FI and certainly FPI. These odds are what I think IrishLax was getting at, since we had all talked about those narratives and the lines not moving the last few weeks FPI/FI would be +122 and +203, respectively. you're +325. If FPI was right Vegas would be bankrupted every fall
Because football is a bit of a silly game to discuss too much in game probabilities even though I do it all the time. Anything can happen any play vs like basketball where the most that can happen is someone scores 3 points T Henderson taking the screen 75 yards, Sawyer strip sack for 85 yards. All the other 115-120 plays of the game were probably pretty even, but those two made it a 14 pt game. We just need to be the team that gets those 2
is this something specific you're referring to? A single play can swing expected win rate by 95%+ in theory
They already are because they still can’t figure out how shu keeps destroying them on the craps tables.
no. Just a general observation. I think I am not reading these things correctly. It is a prediction based on the data you know and assuming It Will keep trending that way, and if it doesn’t anymore the data swings. Probably makes the college game very hard to predict
I'm sure this was covered and I missed it but does the stat keeper just give penalty yardage on a pass play to both the QB and wr? How does this stat line happen?
nope, it has nothing to do with trending any way. It's saying based exactly on what we know now, with the teams involved, here are the chances each team wins Let's say you trust me right now that it's 79% OSU/21% ND And gameday comes and ND wins the coin flip, defers and kicks off and it's a touchback and d I tell you it's still 79%/21%, you'd believe that, right? Nothing really has changed, why wouldn't it be 79%/21%? Now what if instead OSU returns it for a TD? The 79%/21% wasn't wrong, but with new information (a 7-0 OSU lead) you probably wouldn't be surprised to hear that OSU is now more likely to win than they were before kickoff. Maybe 87%/13%. And if instead he fumbles and ND recovers at the 1 they certainly are in a better position than pre-kickoff. They might be up to 35% to win
funny you ask now becaue I was just rewatching the end of the game, I think It happened because of the back pass to allar on the last play and he then sailed the ball out so minus 3
Moore just before the last play was talking incredible shit to 5 from psu, signaling 0 with his hand lol
My bad, Warren caught the ball then swing it back and It was all latérals from there so no catches but minus yards
I told you guys yesterday I thought UT/OSU was the third-biggest game of Notre Dame's season and I still believe that, if Texas had won I'd have you at 40% and OSU I had at 21%. Betting odds land right on that today 21% (+325/-400 implies about 21.2%). I don't think there's value in betting either team at -110 if the spread stays between -7.5 and -9.5. I'd take OSU -7. I'd take ND +10. With the caveat that no team is especially good this year compared to previous years' top teams, OSU is really really good. Very well rounded and elite in a lot of sectors. Both teams are explosive on both sides of the ball and create big plays. There's a level of variance to big plays that should keep you guys excited, you just have to hope they go your way. The top thing to look at imo is ND's early down success rate. It's kind funny considering how great these two teams are that their two biggest weaknesses are inverses. ND gets behind the sticks more often than they should and have third and longs frequently. OSU is in the bottom half of the country in forcing third-and-longs. I think you're more likely to lose than win but if I were to have to pinpoint one thing to look at it's ND's offense avoiding third and long against a team that doesn't force many
Good post and all makes sense. I’d say that two things that get me excited from what I saw in PSU was - 1. 3 passing game explosives to 3 different players. Both defenses are elite (PSU or OSU) so getting some explosives in the passing game against an elite defense I think really raises our ceiling as something not totally built into the numbers 2. as referenced on this page, no WR catches all day by PSU. It’s obviously apples and oranges between us and them, but we’re not gonna have this cover 2 zone for Emeka to sit in like he did vs Texas
Confirmed. I have also referenced my data and have determined that if you keep OSU's receivers to 0 catches and -3 yards that you will likely win
Or just have him put on someone else’s jersey and pretend to be them. I think that would probably work if everyone kept their mouth shut.
USC fans seem to think he’s not bad, he’s undersized and plays fast he’s got 2 or 3 years to develop- helps fill the hole in the recruiting misses from that class