Not legal and could never happen, but the only way to make him feel the fear he caused is to not tell him his execution date, and then randomly once or twice a year take him through the entire process all the way down to being strapped to the injection table. Then take him back to his cell. Can’t do it too often cuz it will lose the impact eventually. But it will get the desired affect enough that he will get to experience similar feelings as his victims.
I think death penalty is the easy way out, but I also don’t want our tax dollars keeping this POS alive for 50+ years. Kill him now.
don't really have an issue with it in situations like his where it's very clearly provable he did these things. i know it costs more for people to be on death row vs life in prison w/o parole, but honestly imo someone like this doesn't need to be rehabilitated.
I disagree. You can’t take back putting someone to death, so the costs associated with getting it right from a legal standpoint are justified.
Curious why the jurors believe he deserves to live after admitting to murdering 17 people, many of them kids. I have no clue how this stuff works.
The death penalty shouldn’t be a thing. The government shouldn’t be in the business of putting its citizens to death
born to a mother who abused drugs and alcohol while pregnant with him and a long history of untreated or under treated mental illness
You can’t have a death penalty buffet. Either you have it or you don’t. And if the state has the power to kill they will inevitably kill innocent people. Id rather pay a very small amount to keep him alive then realize my tax dollars killed someone innocent.
Wonder if anyone from the jury will speak put. It has to be unanimous so curious to what the final count was
For him to have gotten the death penalty, the jury had to be unanimous. I'm curious if there was 1 hold out or if there were multiple
All 12 had to vote in favor of the death penalty for him to get it. So if it's 11-1, it's a life sentence. Unless I'm reading everything wrong?
Oh my bad, I was confused. I saw this post: And then this post: and thought the jury had recommended death but the judge went with life. I thought the jury recommended death and he was sentenced to death, meaning it was unanimous 12-0 for death.
I was following on my phone. So the first part they found the state proved their case. But the 2nd half, they did not. It had to be unamious on both parts so I'm curious as to what the breakdown was for the 2nd part
I mean Republican judges are basically making it easier to get away with murder so I don’t want to hear them complain that the jury don’t vote for the death penalty:
https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local...ror/2883236/?_osource=db_npd_nbc_wtvj_twt_shr Apparently one juror said she felt threatened by another juror. Another one was voting for life from the start and wouldn't budge
Well damn, if they had to wait for a day that wasn't marked by a mass shooting, when would they ever have it!?!? These victims are so selfish sometimes.