Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Mainboard' started by harvey birdman, Dec 8, 2015.
What a fucking lunatic
I think the church was always going to move this direction because they want to stay relevant
If staying relevant means doing the right thing, then?
They walk a fine line between saying sexual relations between people of the same sex is a sin and saying that same sex attraction is part of God's plan and those people can be part of the church.
more like the popular thing. There’s a reason they decided black people could stay black and be faithful right after the civil rights era.
Religion always stays on the cutting edge
Maybe not always but it wasn’t too long ago that church leadership said they would not condemn gay marriage secularly.
well particularly ones invented to be child trafficking Ponzi schemes
I guess in a world where a Ponzi scheme leads to the presidency, tis dangerous indeed
I don’t think it’s just Mormon candidates who use pyramids to get to the Oval
IDK why but this reminded me of the time missionaries approached my stepdad and he asked them what they thought of Mitt Romney buying hookers and blow for the IOC to win the SLC Olympic bid.
Needless to say, they didn’t stick around long.
I should apply for the IOC.
Bc Notre Dame’s law school is vile
Sure that’s why the Catholics are getting soft on stuff too
Remember how everyone knew it was a sham investigation at the time? Thanks Jeff Flake
Susan Collins was allegedly going to spend all day in the SCIF going over the confidential files. And then gave a 20 minute speech defending him.
I'm reading Rise of the Warrior Cop and didn't realize Nixon had four appointees and Ford had one too. So that's 8 appointees for impeached/disgraced regimes in just 12 years while Clinton/Obama get four in 16 years. Add in Reagan's four and lol at anyone who doesn't acknowledge this shit stain of a government institution as illegitimate.
People assuming republicans are acting in good faith despite that never actually being the case has been the largest issue affecting this country for like 50+ years. The unwillingness to just call them on that despite it being the case in like 95% of the shit they do is rage inducing.
Worst part is, if a politician started doing it the media would paint them as being the problem
This is bullshit from the judicial system
Im sure most are aware of it, but the 5-4 podcast is very good. This week's episode previews the cases on this term's docket. Very good and informative. And funny
Shit is just too bleak for me right now. Love the pod and think Peter is fucking hilarious but it just makes me too upset
I love that these justices still act like law, logic, precedent, and intent actually matter to the ghouls in robes next to them.
That is most direct ive seen any of the liberal justices shit over their argument. Usually they speak more obliquely.
It's both hilarious and compelling. Definitely worth a read
Strict Scrutiny is another SCOTUS podcast that is pretty good
I don’t know many black women, but the ones I do are usually pretty direct and don’t mince words.
Insert “saving democracy” meme here
Sotomayor is Puerto Rican....
He doesn’t know many Puerto Rican women either
Putting out some serious liberal wine mom vibes here.
Real probability based on what? Seems like a RT AND FOLLOW IF YOU AGREE type shitpost
this person seems to operate under the assumption that the Supreme Court isn’t a fucking farce
to be clear, that account is squarely in the "retweet if you agree" camp of annoying twitter accounts, but I tend to agree with the premise here, that the wife of Clarence Thomas (if not ol' Clarence himself) was deeply involved in the coup attempt on 1/6/21 and Don has shit in those files pertaining to 1/6.
Is this real or an assumption?
I believe people are speculating his 1/6 phone records could be in there.
Thought it was KBJ who issued that response. My bad.
It was meant as a compliment.
This is probably a very ignorant question but was his defense lawyer a public defendant and if it wasn’t, does that/should that matter?
Like - if he hired a shitty attorney, is that on him, vs it being on the state assigning a shitty public defendant ?
Surely this is from 60 years ago.
What the fucking fuck?
I did the same
Racism is over though.
It doesn’t matter (partly because nothing matters, partly because every client is owed a duty of competence from their lawyer whether you pick them or they get appointed for you)