I’ve said this in this thread before, but the typical TD draft grade will yet again apply. One of these 2 fits like 90% of the picks the guy makes “A good prospect or safe starter, but they reached and probably could’ve traded back for the same player” “A good prospect, but they’ve got other, more pressing areas of need”
We’re absolutely not going to address DL, corner, or RB and it’s gonna result in a top 5 pick next year
We literally have two of the best receivers in the game at creating separation but hey, let’s give Matty more time to throw
Legendary dipshit Buck Belue was talking on the radio earlier about how Quinn shouldn’t be allowed to make decisions tonight. He got his wish because this bullshit has TD’s fingerprints all over it.
I definitely see us trading up in the third for the right guy (corner or DE). But knowing DT, it will be some Stanford tight end.
Here’s a good article on McGary that came out before the combine. https://www.google.com/amp/s/touchd...use-fire-to-the-good-life-at-the-combine/amp/
Every remaining pick we have should be on defense, but something tells me we’ll wind up with a TE and a late skill player or two.
I get that you can’t always just assume “we should’ve traded back” because sometimes nobody is willing to trade up, and if that’s the case then go ahead and get your guy at your pick. However, that should really only apply when you are in need of 1 position above all others. We need at least 3 equally badly, and I just don’t see either of those guys as “best available” in the spots they were taken.
It's hard to find badasses named Kaleb. Are you sure about that? Because it's like Dmitroff would say, can't spell Kaleb without kale.
I imagine if we wanted a tackle we could have taken Dillard, and then not have had to spend as much to move up for a guard that is left (Cody Ford?) But I’m no bike riding vegan