Considering it went from "he could have played if needed against Detroit" to this being a question, who the fuck knows
If there's anyone who can hang 35 on Atlanta with MVS, Shepherd, and Taylor at WR, it's Rodgers. Also helps that the Falcons are junk.
But, the Falcons record is kind of a mirage. They score points in every game. we are without both middle backers, Kenny, and Gary on defense. They will get theirs. We are also missing our top 2 wrs to start the year. We are also missing out #3-5 if you take opt-out and early injuries. This game would be a bigger win then NO imo. (Bigger in terms of ‘holy shit, a lot is stacked up against them’) Atlanta’s offense is every bit as good as Saints and everybody assumes it’s a given, easy trap game.
What we have going for us is LaFleur finds ways to win games and Quinn is great at finding ways to lose games.
Whatever I said earlier? I’m fucking dumb Z came back from the dead (he wasn’t *bad* but he wasn’t last year, lmao that changed) and the defense was great. The offense? That’s a masterful playcalling game with a qb that’s still as good as anybody. Holy shit they scored 30 and it felt like they should have had 45. ML & a-rod needs to go on until he can’t throw anymore. No play is out of bounds now that they are on same page and have offense down.
Alexander shadowed Ridley on 23 of his 27 routes (85%). Ridley went into this game with 3 straight 100 yard games. He had 5 targets and no catches when lined up against Jaire.
Had all the momentum until a bad Rodgers pick 6, next series results in a bounce of hands int. Shit the bed since.
10/04/03 Cal-Oregon State game, Rodgers went 9 for 34 for 52 yards, no TDs and one INT, for a college rating of 33.4.
i always bet $10-$20 per game and have been doing p well. Last Thursday night line was +2.5 and I max bet it ($300) ouch