I feel like I should've paid more attention in school yet I am fairly certain the hospital can tell the judge (and the fucktard physician) to go fuck themselves if the physician doesn't have privileges at that hospital and the treating physicians/ disagree with the management.
As soon as all children can get it I’m all for just letting it run through the deniers. Unfortunately it doesn’t care about any of that though but anyone 18 and above that holds out should just be shunned and left out to pasture. And fed paste.
What's sad is that these people are such a parody I had to actually go to their Twitter to realize this was satire and not real
Having worked in a variety of schools the last 10 years, I feel confident in saying that being AP seems like the worst job in education outside of being a classroom and or ESE teacher.
My wife is an attorney and my best friend is an ICU doctor who oversees the COVID unit at his hospital. Our friends group chat was lit today thanks to this story.
She got a doctor to order it so I believe it is real. The hospital was declining a "doctor's" orders. It'll be appealed and the hospital will win due to lack of privilege according to what I read but as of now I believe it is real You'll be shocked to learn the judge was the Chair of the county's Republican party
A couple of my aggrieved-white-male friends follow that account and send me shit all the time. Usually gets a Tolstoy level thesis back to them about how it’s wrong or lacking context.
No you cannot. It’d be the same as being fired for failing to comply with company policy like refusing a drug test. It’s also through the state. Depending on where she lives she may not even get anywhere near what she was making, but she won’t be able to get it.
Quick google search and found a good article about unemployment and getting fired for insubordination. https://www.wane.com/news/local-new...-fired-because-of-refusal-to-get-the-vaccine/ Cliffs: not happening. According to the Department of Workforce Development (DWD), each case will be decided on the individualized facts. Generally we can say that if the employer has a rule/policy that is consistently applied and related to a business need and has reasonable medical/religious exemptions, then the employee who was terminated would not be eligible for unemployment insurance.
Good luck with it though, as someone who used to run HR for a 5000 enployee company, we once lost an unemployment case in Texas for terminating someone who was routinely going to top golf during his work hours in a company car, in which we had GPS pings of his car in the parking lot.
My company will be terminating anyone who doesn't have at least rd 1 in 6 weeks. No unemployment, no subsidized cobra, loss of accrued bonus and any unvested pension for those that have one
its FDA approved which means that the insurance companies will have to start paying for the treatment, not the govt. Insurance premiums will drastically spike for companies if they allow unvaccinated people to work there because they are the majority being put in hospitals and on ventilators. To protect the company and ultimately, the stockholder's positions, it makes more sense to cut these people out and fire them for being dumbasses than to keep them and live with the consequences of higher insurance premiums for the company.
We once lost an unemployment claim because we had a single mom who missed a documented 26 days in her first 4 months, and since we didn’t have a replacement for her and felt bad cutting her loose we let her stay on for 6 weeks part time while she looked for another job. state said we didn’t terminate for her absenteeism since we let her stay on.
getting paid to skip work and play top golf and then getting paid benefits after being fired for it is prime dudes rock shit more big corporations deserve to be stolen from